Friday 19 December 2014

OUGD602 - Studio: Studio Caserne

I have been following Studio Caserne's work for a while now. They are a design agency based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.


Their website and work is all in french, so it makes it a little hard to get information about them properly, however their behance page is in English, so that makes it slightly easier.

I really like their work because they work across a variety of different styles, from flat design to using photographic imagery. They also seem to do a lot of work for the food and drink sector - something which I really enjoy doing myself.

UQAM



Rutabaga






Tuesday 16 December 2014

OUGD602 - Studio Brief 2: Portfolio/Self Branding Update

As I am now at a stage where OUGD603 has been handed in for an interim submission and my COP3 module is going well, I decided that I needed to focus on my portfolio again for a few days as I feel it is already in need of an update.

Current Portfolio


While I was happy with the portfolio, I do feel there are obvious improvements to be made and it could be redesigned to suit me much more. I don't feel like the content in it shows off my range of skills as well as it could, and now that I have done a couple of months in the third year and have produced some new work, it would be good to include these also instead of some of the other projects which I am less sure about.

Another thing I want to improve upon is the CV side to the portfolio. I wasn't particularly happy with it in the previous portfolio and I do always find this a bit hard to do well.

The main thing that I want to do is put across my interests and what I am good at. The first thing that I want to do to do this is to create my own typeface to use for this portfolio, and use it as a part of my branding.

Over the past few months, due to my COP, I have had a much bigger interest in typography and now have a much better understanding in how typefaces are constructed and how the letters relate to one another. I think that this knowledge is beneficial to creating my own typeface and I now feel confident to do so.

I have previously created around six or seven different typefaces, however I have never really used them much, unless designed specifically for a project. I want to create a typeface that I am happy to use across a range of materials, and use to create my own logo design and branding.


Content
The first thing I did was look over my current portfolio and make a list of all the projects which are currently in it, and which ones I was unsure about having in there or don't want to have in there anymore.

Projects in Portfolio
  • YCN Domino's Pizza
  • The Evolution of the Alphabet
  • Ampersandwich
  • YCN Oasis
  • Air Jordan Publication
  • Top 10 NBA Players Exhibition
  • Courtside Typeface
  • Finding Vegan App - Client Brief
  • The Family Postcard Logo - Client Brief
  • Mike Marshall Logo - Client Brief
  • The Woodshop Logo - Client Brief
  • Massage Williamsburg Logo - Client Brief
  • The Soul House Logo - Client Brief
  • Classic Quality Meal Service Logo - Client Brief
  • Wheatless & More Identity - Client Brief
Projects I am unsure about/Want to take out
  • The Evolution of the Alphabet
  • Amersandwich
  • YCN Oasis
There are three big projects which I don't want to include anymore because I don't feel they best show off my abilities, mainly because they are all at least six months old, and I have moved on a huge amount in the way I design now.

I have two projects which I would like to include now from OUGD603 - Typography Principles Publication, and 30 Days - the 30 days of hand drawn type.

I think I could also structure the content better and create sections depending on the brief itself. I also want to include some of the typefaces I have previously created as it will show my interest and capabilities in typography design.

With this included it gives me four sections for the portfolio - About Me, Projects, Typefaces & Client Briefs. This will show off a range of work in each of the sections and show what I am capable of as a designer.

Including client briefs also shows that I have communicated with a client and fulfilled work for them, working in a professional manner instead of just having university set work. It shows independence, and that I have completed a variety of different jobs for clients - e.g. an App for FindingVegan, and an identity for Wheatless & More.

Below is a list of the content I want to include in the sections.

Projects
  • YCN Domino's Pizza
  • Air Jordan Publication
  • Top 10 NBA Players Exhibition
  • Typography Principles
  • 30 Days
Typefaces
  • Courtside Typeface
  • + 3 other typefaces created
Client Work
  • Finding Vegan App
  • Logofolio - a folio of logo designs created for clients
  • Wheatless & More Identity
Overall this gives me a total of 11 projects and a logofolio with a variety of client logo designs created. I am unsure whether I need another project in the 'projects' section. The only thing that I have noticed is that apart from the 'Finding Vegan App', I don't really have any digital work. This was originally the 'Evolution of the Alphabet' project's job in showing that, however I really don't think that shows off the best of my ability at all, so I need to think about if there is something I want to include to substitute this.

Friday 12 December 2014

OUGD602 - Contacting Leo Burnett

Following my week long placement in summer, I contacted Leo Burnett about the possibility of spending another week or two there for a placement.

I really enjoyed it in summer and everyone was very friendly, and I was given the offer to be able to come back for another couple of weeks when I wanted to. I found that I learnt a lot while I was there and was able to see how a large agency works.

Hopefully I can go back and have a week or two working with them again.

Monday 8 December 2014

Client Brief - Wheatless & More

Rationale

This is a client brief which I got after winning the initial identity design competition. The client wants this identity extended across both printed and digital material for promotional purposes.

The original logo is very simple and clean, something which needs to be considered in the overall design of all the elements. The logo is to be the main focus on a lot of the promotional material, so the supporting design must follow the same simple aesthetic and not be overpowering.

The branding colours are the only colours that must be used across all material. There are also a number of supporting images which can be used to variate from block colours. All the material must work well together to create a strong and simple identity for the brand.


Final Images


























Design Boards

Sunday 7 December 2014

OUGD602 - Studio: Sawdust

Link

Sawdust is the award-winning creative partnership of Rob Gonzalez and Jonathan Quainton based in London. They focus on bespoke typography, image-making and visual identity across a diverse range of sectors.

Work

The Kitchen


Wired UK



Unequivocal Ambiguity



I like Sawdust's work because of how the majority of it is typographically driven, but they clearly show strong skills in image creation too. The typography they create is contemporary and innovative and really makes me rethink the creation process to a typeface. With this typographical work, it is refined, with the rest of the supporting work minimal and uncluttered, fully showing off the impressive nature of their works in a professional way.

Tuesday 2 December 2014

OUGD602 - Wheatless & More Website Live

Today I found that the Wheatless & More website has gone live, and while I did not create the designs for the website, I did give a little bit of input into the homepage design, and it is always exciting to see my designs being used and be live.

Link



Monday 1 December 2014

OUGD602 - Potenital Client Brief: Unique Muscle Update

Previous post

While I initially thought that this brief wasn't happening, the client messaged me back finally after a month asking for me to create the label design for the supplement products in the brown kraft bags.

They asked for me to follow the two products that they had sent that they like (Celebrate Health & 12 Health). The label was to be 150x185mm, portrait. It had to be a one design fits all outcome so it work would consistently across the products. At this point they left it up to me to decide what to do, and told me to get all the content from the website. They wanted it done within two weeks.

Initially I was quite happy to have them get back in contact and to be able to do this brief as it is a quick one and is something that I haven't done a huge amount of.

I sent across some initial designs, however the client didn't like any of them and was unhappy at the fact that they weren't like the examples given. This was a bit annoying because the client had said they wanted to see what designs I came up with, and I obviously didn't want to copy the designs they had said they liked.

I sent across some more designs, which again the client didn't like. At this point they didn't know what feedback to give to give me more of an idea of what they wanted in the design. In response to this I sent them a message telling them that the ideas were initial ideas, not final designs, so any element from any of them that they liked, they could tell me and I would move forward with that, such as a layout design or a font choice.

I also explained to them that while they like the two examples given, they are hugely different in the way they are constructed - the Celebrate Health is very structured with sans serif type, bold colours and imagery, and the 12 Health is very simple, completely type based and is script type. I asked them to tell me what they liked specifically about each of these, so I could get a feel of the kind of design they wanted, because up to this point I didn't have much of an idea.

However, the client completely ignored this and asked me if I could create a design similar to the two examples they provided. This was completely frustrating obviously because I didn't want to copy the designs at all, and as they were so different it wouldn't be like I could create one design that was similar to both of them.

I decided to follow this and worked on some initial ideas based on the designs of what they liked, starting with the same designs and them merging them together to create an individual design for the label. While I wasn't particularly happy with doing this, I thought I could at least get some kind of feedback from the client.

Once again I didn't get any feedback which was useful or constructive. The client proceeded to tell me that they felt there was no design aspect to the ideas, and they had previously done something similar on Microsoft Paint.

Obviously I found this pretty offensive and frustrating. I had spent time making these initial ideas for them, and instead of giving valid feedback and replying back to messages I had sent, they just continued to ignore me before essentially saying they could do better on Paint. While they are the ones asking me to create the design, I don't think that this is an acceptable way to speak to me as I am doing work for them and asking for their input.

I decided at this point that the brief was clearly going nowhere. Creating a design for a client is obviously a two way process as the client is the one who sets the brief and they want to be as happy with the final outcome as I am as a designer. The fact that they were ignoring me every time I was asking for their input was frustrating and confusing to me as I was only trying to do what they wanted, and let them have an input into the design, which is surely what a client wants because it's their product at the end of the day.

I sent the client a message to say I couldn't continue with the brief for them because it was not getting anywhere. I detailed the reasons for them so they knew why, explaining that them ignoring my questions and queries makes it near impossible for me to create something I know fits in with what they are looking for.

I presented them with three completely different concepts, with multiple variations for each concept, and no feedback was given apart from 'no', deeming it useless and ineffective. I explained that feedback is needed in a client brief as the client gets their input and I am not wasting my time designing work that isn't fitting what they want. They had also told me to get all the information off the website instead of indicating what they actually wanted. This meant that I had to guess what was needed, which was pretty impossible to do considering I haven't a clue about the brand or products. I explained that while they know everything about the brand and the products, I do not, and I need to know what I'm working with to give them the best possible design. I also wrote about the fact I had created at least forty variations of these three concepts without securement of an agreed payment, meaning I had done a lot of work for nothing at this point. On a final note I said that their comments had been quite offensive and made me feel unappreciated as a designer


Overall I am disappointed and frustrated by the way this brief ended up. I felt that the client clearly didn't know what they wanted, or was willing to engage with me and give feedback on initial designs. This is something that was quite a surprise to me. Previously the people who I have created work for have liked the fact that they had an input and could develop the final outcome with me, giving them a feeling of real investment and a final design which they are very happy with. I don't understand why someone wouldn't want to engage in that and know the design they are getting is something they are happy with an contributing to.

It was my first bad experience with a client in terms of how they spoke to me. I didn't feel appreciated at all as a designer, and they clearly wanted the job done quickly, but also cheaply, offering me a small amount of payment, which wasn't agreed upon in the end. I felt as thought they picked me at random and thought they could get it done cheaply.

As they approached me for the brief I was happy to do this at first, and thought that it would be quite a fun brief and interesting to work on. However, now I think I will be a lot more careful about clients because I certainly don't want to have one speak to me offensively or ignore my input or questions. It has also taught me what I need to know from a client to complete a brief, and has taught me about how I like to work with a client one on one.